Concepts and Meaning in Medieval Philosophy

Philosophy and Theology 8:1-20 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his recent study, Concepts, Fodor identifies five nonnegotiable constraints on any theory of concepts. These theses were all shared by the standard medieval theories of concepts. However, those theories were cognitivist, in contrast with Fodor’s: concepts are definitions, a form of natural knowledge. The medieval theories were formed under two influences, from Aristotle by way of Boethius, and from Augustine. The tension between them resulted in the Ockhamist notion of a natural language, concepts as signs. Thus conventional signs, spoken and written, signify things in the world by the mediation of concepts which themselves form a language of thought, signifying those things naturally by their similarity. Indeed, later thinkers realised that everything signifies itself and what is like it naturally in a broad sense by means of the concept of its natural likeness

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
28 (#587,772)

6 months
2 (#1,258,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Read
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Insolubles.Paul Vincent Spade - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Descartes: new thoughts on the senses.Gary Hatfield - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (3):443-464.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ockham on mental.John Trentman - 1970 - Mind 79 (316):586-590.
How Is Material Supposition Possible?Stephen Read - 1999 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 8 (1):1-20.

Add more references