Making Connections: Categorisations and Particularisations in Students' Literary Argument [Book Review]

Argumentation 23 (4):531-546 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article investigates how students reason and argue to make sense of fictional literature. Excerpts from students’ talk are analysed using the concepts categorisation, particularisation and recontextualisation, and interpreted from a socio-cultural, dialogical perspective. The analyses show that the students’ arguments oscillate between personal experience and the novel, and between categorising and particularising perspectives. The subject relevance of talk that lies between everyday and scientific talk, and between personal and analytic readings, is revealed. The bridging of different readings, different language practices, and different learning contexts is discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theory of knowledge: course companion.Eileen Dombrowski - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Lena Rotenberg, Mimi Bick & Richard van de Lagemaat.
March Madness.Eric Riviello - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (2):141-150.
How to do things with logic.C. Grant Luckhardt - 1994 - Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
March Madness.Sally J. Scholz & Eric Riviello - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (2):141-150.
Becoming‐Teachers: Desiring students.Duncan Mercieca - 2012 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (s1):43-56.
Getting Started.Dennis Earl - 2005 - Teaching Philosophy 28 (3):249-259.
Looking for a Fight.Kurt Mosser - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (4):343-362.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-11

Downloads
16 (#912,482)

6 months
2 (#1,206,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thought and Language.A. L. Wilkes, L. S. Vygotsky, E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (55):178.
Thought and Language.Lev Vygotsky - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (2):190-191.

Add more references