A Systematic Review of Multiple Terminologies for ICT in Government: A Mesh of Concentric and Overlapping Circles

Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 40 (1-2):3-14 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of the current article is to identify the frequently used terms for the field of study that deals with the information and communication technology usage in the government and explore the difference and relationship, if any, between these terms. This field of study is inundated with old and new terminologies that lack clarity of usage leading to opportunistic usage, confusion, and impacting accumulation of knowledge. A three-stage search was followed to: (1) identify key terms used to refer to the field of study; (2) identify top ranked journals across social science, computer, and business management that publish in this field; and (3) identify the most frequently used terms in these select journals. The seven terms thus identified are smart government, e-government, e-governance, digital government, open government, e-democracy, and e-participation. The origin, definitions, and models of these terms is further explored, and their relationship is illustrated in diagrams of concentric and overlapping circles. The current study is a step toward developing a stable and dependable vocabulary that may benefit scholars in operationalizing the terms and practitioners in policy implementation and assessing policy effectiveness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

E-governance mechanism in pakistan: An analytical perspective.Muhammad Ali & Mughees Ahmed - 2016 - Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 55 (1):63-74.
The nature and accessibility of e-government in sub-Saharan Africa.Patrick Ngulube - 2007 - International Review of Information Ethics 7 (9):1-13.
Medical insurance payments and patients involved in research.Angela R. Holder - 1993 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 16 (1-2):19-22.
E-government in Ukraine: a formality or an effective mechanism for democratization.V. Pashchenko - 2013 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (23):123-128.
OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories.Helen McGough - 1997 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 20 (1):9-11.
The process of transformation of the Ukrainian party system: from atomized system to the system of polarized pluralism.L. Shachkovska - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 3 (22):222-227.
For whose benefit? Fear and loathing in the welfare state.Arianna Bove - 2014 - Journal of Political Marketing 13 (1-2):108-126.
Business Ethics.Iwao Taka - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (1):53-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-13

Downloads
6 (#1,467,817)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references