Non‐Standard Neutral Free Logic, Empty Names and Negative Existentials

Abstract

In this paper I am concerned with an analysis of negative existential sentences that contain proper names only by using negative or neutral free logic. I will compare different versions of neutral free logic with the standard system of negative free logic (Burge, Sainsbury) and aim to defend my version of neutral free logic that I have labeled non-standard neutral free logic.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Names, fictional names, and 'really'.R. M. Sainsbury - 1999 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):243–269.
Philosophical applications of free logic.Karel Lambert (ed.) - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Recovering What Is Said With Empty Names.Gualtiero Piccinini & Sam Scott - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):239-273.
How to be R eally Contraction-Free.Greg Restall - 1993 - Studia Logica 52 (3):381 - 391.
Mustn't whatever is referred to exist?Gilbert Plumer - 1989 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (4):511-528.
Unstable Truthmaking.Jamin Asay & Sam Baron - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):230-238.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-06

Downloads
1,451 (#7,373)

6 months
172 (#17,957)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dolf Rami
King's College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references