Jean Cavaillès and the Vienna Circle

Grazer Philosophische Studien 27 (1):155-176 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

French epistemology of mathematics — Cavailles, Lautman, Herbrand — took a critical position about the project for a theory of science stated by the Vienna Circle. The opportunity was provided by the International Congress of Philosophy of Science celebrated in Prague in 1936. The position taken by Cavailles and Lautmann was surprisingly close to that taken by Tarski's introduction of semantics and to Wittgenstein's Tractatus. More specifically, to those parts of the Tractatus that were disqualified by Carnap. This criticism will be a part of what would later constitute "mathematical philosophy".

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anti-foundationalism and the vienna circle's revolution in philosophy.Thomas E. Uebel - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):415-440.
Susan Stebbing's Criticism of Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Nikolay Milkov - 2003 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 10:351-63.
The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap: to the Vienna station.Alberto Coffa - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Linda Wessels.
A Virtual Debate in Exile: Cassirer and the Vienna Circle after 1933.Thomas Mormann - 2012 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 16:149 - 167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
21 (#741,388)

6 months
2 (#1,206,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Bibliographie de Jean Cavaillès établie le 10 juillet 2018.Paul Cortois - 2020 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 106 (2):209-229.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references