Cloning—Usurping the Creator?

Global Bioethics 14 (2-3):59-67 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Creating a man by means of cloning will certainly raise many legal and halakhic questions. But is this sufficient reason to restrain human creativity? Artificial insemination as well as surrogate motherhood also brought many questions, among them questions concerning who is considered the child's father and who is considered the child's mother. But grave questions such as these arise in every field of human endeavor. The emergence of new questions is however not in itself reason to prohibit the creative endeavors that give rise to them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cloning: The Human as Created Co-Creator.Bart Hansen & Paul Schotmsans - 2005 - Ethical Perspectives 8 (2):75-87.
Human Cloning: A Case of no Harm Done?M. A. Roberts - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (5):537-554.
Cloning: Then and Now.Daniel Callahan - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (2):141-144.
The Topsy-Turvy Cloning Law.Iain Brassington & Stuart Oultram - 2011 - Monash Bioethics Review 29 (3):1-18.
Cloning: The Human as Created Co-Creator.Bart Hansen & Paul Schotsmans - 2001 - Ethical Perspectives 8 (2):75-87.
A wolf in sheep’s cloning?Richard Hanley - 1999 - Monash Bioethics Review 18 (1):59-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
10 (#1,201,046)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references