In Favor of Impropriety

Constructivist Foundations 15 (3):213-216 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heras-Escribano argues against the normative character of affordances from a framework that relies on a Wittgensteinian notion of normativity and the incompatibility of direct perception, …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are affordances normative?Manuel Heras-Escribano & Manuel de Pinedo - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):565-589.
Are affordances normative?Manuel Pinedo & Manuel Heras-Escribano - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):565-589.
In Defence of a Relational Ontology of Affordances.Julian Kiverstein - 2020 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (3):226-229.
Reclaiming Meaning, Reclaiming Normativity.Laura Mojica - 2020 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (3):216-218.
The Fundamentality of Fit.Christopher Howard - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 14.
Two claims about epistemic propriety.E. J. Coffman - 2011 - Synthese 181 (3):471-488.
Ethics: the appearance of impropriety.Joseph S. Fulda - 1996 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 26 (4):22-23.
Précis of The Philosophy of Affordances.Manuel Heras-Escribano - 2020 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (3):199-213.
The Case of the Crooked Case Worker.Thomas P. Corbin Jr - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 13:407-412.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-06

Downloads
21 (#734,423)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Vicente Raja
University of Western Ontario
Anthony Chemero
University of Cincinnati

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references