Loss of control is not necessary to induce behavioral consequences of deprivation: The case of religious fasting during Ramadan

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pepper & Nettle argue that the more present-oriented behavior associated with a low socioeconomic status is an adaptive response to having relatively little control over the future. However, a study of fasters during Ramadan shows that self-imposed deprivation, which carries no implications regarding the ability to realize deferred rewards, is associated with loss and risk aversion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Newman’s Silence on Fasting as a Roman Catholic.Daniel J. Lattier - 2009 - Newman Studies Journal 6 (2):38-48.
Religion and medicine or the spiritual dimension of healing.Dima-Cozma Corina & Cozma Sebastian - 2012 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (31):31-48.
Self-control: Beyond commitment.Howard Rachlin - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):109-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-02

Downloads
36 (#446,570)

6 months
10 (#277,276)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations