Recasting the Debate on Multiple Listing for Transplantation through Consideration of Both Principles and Practice

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):330-339 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Debates continue to surround the system in the United States for allocating transplantable cadaveric organs, due in large part to the scarcity of such organs in relation to the number of individuals waiting to undergo transplantation. Candidates awaiting transplantation gain access to cadaveric organs by being placed by individual transplant programs on the national list of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, overseen by the United Network for Organ Sharing. In recent years, the UNOS board has visited the issue of multiple listing, that is, allowing one candidate to be registered on the waiting lists of two or more transplant programs, and has continued to permit multiple listing

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Issues in the Use of Multiple Survey Reminders.Jacki Schirmer - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):125-139.
Reevaluating the Dead Donor Rule.Mike Collins - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):1-26.
The Problem with Polygamy.Thom Brooks - 2009 - Philosophical Topics 37 (2):109-122.
Homeopathy and Medical Ethics.David Shaw - 2011 - Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies 16 (1):17-21.
Scientific realism, scientific practice, and the natural ontological attitude.André Kukla - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):955-975.
Multiple identity.Roland Puccetti - 1973 - Personalist 54 (3):203-13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
25 (#638,257)

6 months
8 (#373,029)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rachel Allyson Ankeny
University of Adelaide

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references