- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A simple solution to the hardest logic puzzle ever
Analysis 68 (2):105-112 (2008)
Abstract
We present the simplest solution ever to 'the hardest logic puzzle ever'. We then modify the puzzle to make it even harder and give a simple solution to the modified puzzle. The final sections investigate exploding god-heads and a two-question solution to the original puzzle.Author Profiles
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- analysis.oxfordjournals.org (no proxy)
- analysis.oxfordjournals.org [2] (no proxy)
- analysis.oxfordjournals.org [3] (no proxy)
- analysis.oxfordjournals.org [4] (no proxy)
- analysis.oxfordjournals.org [5] (no proxy)
- blackwell-synergy.com (no proxy)
- jstor.org (no proxy)
- academic.oup.com (no proxy)
- pure.ed.ac.uk
(no proxy) - research.ed.ac.uk (no proxy)
- research.ed.ac.uk [2] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever Cannot Be Solved in Less than Three Questions.Gregory Wheeler & Pedro Barahona - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):493-503.
Some thoughts about the hardest logic puzzle ever.Tim S. Roberts - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (6):609-612.
The new paradox of the stone revisited.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):261-268.
A pragmatic solution to Ostertag’s puzzle.Philip Atkins - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):359-365.
How to solve the hardest logic puzzle ever in two questions.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):39-44.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
417 (#47,472)
6 months
31 (#105,249)
2009-01-28
Downloads
417 (#47,472)
6 months
31 (#105,249)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Reasoning About Agent Types and the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever.Fenrong Liu & Yanjing Wang - 2013 - Minds and Machines 23 (1):123-161.
How to solve the hardest logic puzzle ever in two questions.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):39-44.
Assertoric Semantics and the Computational Power of Self-Referential Truth.Stefan Wintein - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):317-345.
Why the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever Cannot Be Solved in Less than Three Questions.Gregory Wheeler & Pedro Barahona - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):493-503.
References found in this work
Foundations of Illocutionary Logic.John Rogers Searle & Daniel Vanderveken - 1985 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Foundations of Illocutionary Logic.Jerrold M. Sadock - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):300-302.
Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts. [REVIEW]Chris Potts - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):707-749.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-g9b9l uwo