Putnam, languages and worlds

Dialectica 55 (2):167–174 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The key argument of Hilary Putnam for conceptual relativism, his so-called mereological argument, is critically evaluated. It is argued that Putnam’s reasoning is based on confusion between languages and theories.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Putnam's model-theoretic argument(s). A detailed reconstruction.Jürgen Dümont - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (2):341-364.
Goodman and Putnam on the making of worlds.Damian Cox - 2003 - Erkenntnis 58 (1):33 - 46.
Hilary Putnam: realism, reason, and the uses of uncertainty.Christopher Norris - 2002 - New York: Distributed in the U.S. by Palgrave.
Comments and Replies.Hilary Putnam - 1994 - In Peter Clark & Bob Hale (eds.), Reading Putnam. Blackwell. pp. 242--95.
More on Putnam and Tarski.Panu Raatikainen - 2003 - Synthese 135 (1):37 - 47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
746 (#22,059)

6 months
125 (#32,227)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Panu Raatikainen
Tampere University

Citations of this work

Putnam’s Conception of Ontology.Sami Pihlström - 2006 - Contemporary Pragmatism 3 (2):1-13.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Replies.W. V. Quine - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):264 - 322.
Enchanting Views.Simon Blackburn - 1994 - In Peter Clark & Bob Hale (eds.), Reading Putnam. Blackwell. pp. 12--30.

Add more references