Grades of Probability Modality in the Law of Evidence

Studia Logica 94 (3):307-330 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper presents an infinite hierarchy PR m [ m = 1, 2, . . . ] of sound and complete axiomatic systems for modal logic with graded probabilistic modalities , which are to reflect what I have elsewhere called the Bolding-Ekelöf degrees of evidential strength as applied to the establishment of matters of fact in law-courts. Our present approach is seen to differ from earlier work by the author in that it treats the logic of these graded modalities not only from a semantical or model-theoretic viewpoint but from a prooftheoretical and axiomatic stance as well. A paramount feature of the approach is its use of so-called systematic frame constants as labels of diverse grades of probability. Apart from this novel feature our approach can be seen to go back to pioneering work by Lou Goble in 1970.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Three grades of probabilistic involvement.Howard Smokler - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 32 (2):129 - 142.
Conditionalizing on knowledge.Timothy Williamson - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):89-121.
Stronger evidence.Peter Achinstein - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (3):329-350.
Grades Of Modality.L. F. Goble - 1970 - Logique Et Analyse 13:323-334.
Old evidence and new explanation.Carl G. Wagner - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):677-691.
An Immanent Machine: Reconsidering grades, historical and present.Charles Tocci - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (7):762-778.
The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability Before Pascal.James Franklin - 2001 - Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Discussion note: Positive relevance defended.Sherrilyn Roush† - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (1):110-116.
David Hume and the probability of miracles.George I. Mavrodes - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (3):167-182.
Statistische Schlussweisen in Entscheidungsbegründungen.Michael Mauer - 2015 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 101 (1):87-123.
Evidence without Priors.Kai Draper - 2010 - Philo 13 (1):18-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-31

Downloads
81 (#210,424)

6 months
9 (#349,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The inference to the best explanation.Gilbert H. Harman - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):88-95.
Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I. Normal Propositional Calculi.Saul A. Kripke - 1963 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9 (5‐6):67-96.
The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice.Paul R. Thagard - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy 75 (2):76-92.
Inference to the Best explanation.Peter Lipton - 2004 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge. pp. 193.

View all 15 references / Add more references