Śamkara's principle and two ontomystical arguments

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (2):111-120 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wright on Moore.José L. Zalabardo - 2012 - In Annalisa Coliva (ed.), Mind, meaning, and knowledge: themes from the philosophy of Crispin Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 304–322.
The best of all possible worlds.Campbell Brown & Y. Nagasawa - 2005 - Synthese 143 (3):309-320.
Conceivability and modal knowledge.René van Woudenberg - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (2):210–221.
The ontomystical argument revisited.T. Ryan Byerly - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (2):95 - 105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
136 (#138,602)

6 months
14 (#199,983)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander R. Pruss
Baylor University

Citations of this work

Symmetry's revenge.Joseph C. Schmid - 2023 - Analysis 83 (4):723-731.
A defense of modal appearances.C. A. McIntosh - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89 (3):243-261.
Modal Ontological Arguments.Gregory R. P. Stacey - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (8):e12938.
The ontomystical argument revisited.T. Ryan Byerly - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (2):95 - 105.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references