Didymus’ Commentary on pindar's Paeans

Classical Quarterly 73 (1):481-483 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines the citation of Didymus’ ‘first’ commentary on Pindar's Paeans in Ammon. Diff. 231 Nickau. It argues that the commentary on the Paeans was the first volume in Didymus’ commentary to all of Pindar.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0009838823000058

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Arius Didymus on Peripatetic Ethics, Household Management, and Politics: Text, Translation, and Discussion.William W. Fortenbaugh (ed.) - 2017 - New York, NY: Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities.
Commentary on Pindar W. J. Verdenius: Commentaries on Pindar, vol. II: Olympian Odes 1, 10, 11, Nemean 11, Isthmian 2. (Mnemosyne Suppl. 101.) Pp. xi + 154. Leiden, New York, Copenhagen and Cologne: Brill, 1988. Paper, fl. 62. [REVIEW]Christopher Carey - 1990 - The Classical Review 40 (02):216-217.
Aristarchus’ work in progress: What did aristonicus and didymus read of aristarchus?Francesca Schironi - 2015 - Classical Quarterly 65 (2):609-627.
Commentaries on Pindar W. J. Verdenius: Commentaries on Pindar, Vol. 1: Olympian Odes 3, 7, 12, 14. (Mnemosyne, Suppl. 97.) Pp. xii+132. Leiden: Brill, 1987. Paper, fl. 54. [REVIEW]Douglas E. Gerber - 1988 - The Classical Review 38 (02):203-205.
Didymus the Blind, Origen, and the Trinity.Kellen Dale Plaxco - 2015 - Dissertation, Ku Leuven
Pindar's Paeans Stefan Lorenz Radt: Pindars Zweiter und Sechster Paian. Pp. 36 (text); iii+215 (commentary). Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert, 1958. Paper, fl. 20. [REVIEW]H. T. Deas - 1959 - The Classical Review 9 (03):233-234.
Pindar's Paeans. [REVIEW]H. T. Deas - 1959 - The Classical Review 9 (3):233-234.
On the Paeans of Pindar.A. E. Housman - 1908 - The Classical Review 22 (01):8-12.
The Paeans of Pindar and other New Literature.A. W. Verrall - 1908 - The Classical Review 22 (04):110-118.
An Edition of Pindar's Paeans. [REVIEW]Christopher Carey - 1991 - The Classical Review 41 (1):14-15.
The ‘Theban Eagle’.Richard Stoneman - 1976 - Classical Quarterly 26 (2):188-197.
The 'Theban Eagle'.Richard Stoneman - 1976 - Classical Quarterly 26 (02):188-.
Pindar, Pythian 4 Bruce Karl Braswell: A Commentary on the Fourth Pythian Ode of Pindar. (Texte und Kommentare, 14.) Pp. xi + 448. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1988. DM 260. [REVIEW]Douglas E. Gerber - 1989 - The Classical Review 39 (02):181-183.
A Commentary On Pindar "nemean" One By Bruce Karl Braswell; Pindar's Feasts Or The Music Of Power By Thomas Cole. [REVIEW]Thomas Hubbard - 1994 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 88:128-129.
The Soul-Body Compound in Didymus the Blind’s Commentary on Genesis and its Neoplatonic Background.Daria Szymańska-Kuta - 2015 - Studia Religiologica 48 (4):271-289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-30

Downloads
5 (#1,533,504)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references