Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law

Studia Logica 64 (1):143-146 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0792347765

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Henry Prakken, logical tools for modelling legal argument: A study of defeasible reasoning in law. [REVIEW]L. M. M. Royakkers - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (3):379-387.
Henry Prakken (1997), Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law.Robert Alexy - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (1):65-72.
Henry Prakken (1997). Logical tools for modelling legal argument. A study of defeasible reasoning in law.Bart Verheij - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (1):35-65.
Review of H. Prakken, Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. [REVIEW]R. P. Loui - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1840-1841.
AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes.Henry Prakken - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):303-320.
Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning.John F. Horty - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):1-28.
Modelling inference in argumentation through labelled deduction: Formalization and logical properties. [REVIEW]Carlos Iván Chesñevar & Guillermo Ricardo Simari - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (1):93-124.
Modelling def+easible reasoning by means of adaptive logic games.Peter Verdée - 2012 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 20 (2):417-437.
Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: Argumentation schemes and generalisations. [REVIEW]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed & Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):125-165.
Patricia Bizzell & Bruce Herzberg (eds.), The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present Henry Prakken, Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument.R. P. Loui - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3:143-150.
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning.H. Prakken & G. Sartor - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):331-368.
Self-defeating arguments.John L. Pollock - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):367-392.
Defeasible reasoning in japanese criminal jurisprudence.Katsumi Nitta & Masato Shibasaki - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (1-2):139-159.
Why non-monotonic logic is inadequate to represent balancing arguments.Jan-R. Sieckmann - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):211-219.
Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law.Jaap Hage - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):137-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Narration in judiciary fact-finding: a probabilistic explication.Rafal Urbaniak - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (4):345-376.
Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law.Jaap Hage - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):137-172.
Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories.Giovanni Sartor - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):217-251.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references