Lois et limites de l’institution symbolique : Husserl confronté à Peirce et Frege

Philosophie 159 (4):93-123 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, Dominique Pradelle focuses on the act of symbolic institution that establishes the alphabet of signs: Is it a matter of the free establishment of an operative meaning or is it governed by necessary laws? In the latter case, where did they come from? The author shows that these laws come from the upper layers of meaning and ideal objects—which has the essential consequence, in transcendental phenomenology, of removing the Husserlian concept of transcendental constitution from the paradigm of a free production of the meaning and of the objects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Frege's attack on Husserl and Cantor.Claire Ortiz Hill - 1994 - The Monist 77 (3):345 - 357.
Husserl and Frege on Functions.Claire Ortiz Hill - 2016 - In Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (ed.), Husserl as Analytic Philosopher. de Gruyter. pp. 89-118.
Husserl and Frege. [REVIEW]Peter M. Simons - 1984 - Philosophical Quarterly 34 (136):420.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-28

Downloads
23 (#684,863)

6 months
20 (#131,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dominique Pradelle
Université Paris-Sorbonne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references