Investigating Pre-School Children’s Ability to Formulate Logical Arguments

Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 36 (1):89-109 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper attempts to investigate five and six-year old children’s ability to formulate logical reasoning. More specifically, our interest focuses on the investigation of young children’s ability to use arguments based on logical reasoning. Can pre-school children build arguments based on logical reasoning such as deductive reasoning, or forms of indirect reasoning? Can teaching contribute to the development of you children’s ability to manipulate logical reasoning in the forms previously mentioned? These are the basic questions we attempt to answer in this paper. Thirteen pre-school children participated in the study. The children were involved in organized dialogues in order to investigate their ability to build logical argumentation. Our findings showed that the children had the ability to use arguments with structures, resembling reasoning found in formal logic such as deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, as well as reasoning based on the law of excluded middle.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Motivational Aspects of Philosophy for Children.Eugenio Echeverria - 1985 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 6 (1).
The Psychology of Logical Reasoning.John Samuel Lindsey - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Virginia
Elements of Logical Reasoning.Jan von Plato - 2013 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Logical Particularism.Nicole Wyatt & Gillman Payette - 2018 - In Jeremy Wyatt, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Nathan Kellen (eds.), Pluralisms in Truth and Logic. Cham, Switzerland and Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 277-299.
Children's Reasoning and the Mind.Peter Mitchell & Kevin John Riggs (eds.) - 2000 - Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
Why non-monotonic logic is inadequate to represent balancing arguments.Jan-R. Sieckmann - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):211-219.
Logic, Reasoning and the Logical Constants.Pascal Engel - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):219-235.
A Logical Analysis of Slippery Slope Arguments.Georg Spielthenner - 2010 - Health Care Analysis 18 (2):148-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-03

Downloads
2 (#1,809,554)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Research Methods in Education.L. Cohen, L. Manion & K. Morrison - 2000 - British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (4):446-446.
The Child's Conception of Space.Jean Piaget, Baerbel Inhelder, F. J. Langdon & J. L. Lunzer - 1957 - British Journal of Educational Studies 5 (2):187-189.
Philosophy in the classroom.Matthew Lipman - 1980 - Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Edited by Ann Margaret Sharp & Frederick S. Oscanyan.
Philosophy in the Classroom.Matthew Lipman, Ann Margaret Sharp & Frederick S. Oscanyan - 1977 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 51 (2):213-214.

View all 15 references / Add more references