Shades of the liar

Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (3):370 - 386 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00129609

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Shades of possibility.John F. Post - 1974 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1/2):155 - 158.
The liar, the strengthened liar, and bivalence.Adam Rieger - 2001 - Erkenntnis 54 (2):195-203.
Liar paradox.Bradley Dowden - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On the storeyed revenge of strengthened liars, and the contrary finality of no-proposition resolutions.Jordan Howard Sobel - manuscript
1 out of the liar tangle.Hartley Slater - manuscript
The early Arabic liar: the liar paradox in the Islamic world from the mid-ninth to the mid-thirteenth centuries CE.Ahmed Alwishah & David Sanson - 2009 - Vivarium 47 (1):97-127.
Unity, truth and the liar: the modern relevance of medieval solutions to the liar paradox.Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo & Emmanuel Genot (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Springer.
Logic without Truth: Buridan on the Liar.Gyula Klima - 2008 - In Shahid Rahman, Tero Tulenheimo & Emmanuel Genot (eds.), Unity, truth and the liar: the modern relevance of medieval solutions to the liar paradox. New York: Springer. pp. 87-112.
Shades and shining: Thoughts on John Sallis's shades – of painting at the limit. [REVIEW]Gary Shapiro - 2002 - Continental Philosophy Review 35 (1):87-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#548,845)

6 months
7 (#489,614)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Liar and Theories of Truth.John Hawthorn - 1983 - Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)
Propositions, possible languages and the liar's revenge.John F. Post - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):223-234.
Reviews. [REVIEW]John F. Post - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):73-81.
Reviews. [REVIEW]Peter Machamer & Stephen Lunsford - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):81-82.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references