Some remarks on panpsychism and epiphenomenalism

Dialectica 31 (1‐2):177-86 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many writers, both scientists and philosophers, when discussing the mind‐body problem, adopt what might be called the physicalist principle of the closedness of the physical world. They reject the possibility that the physical world is causally open to a realm of conscious experience that is not part of it.Among the upholders of such a view are those who may be called radical materialists or radical physicalists, who deny that there exists a realm of conscious experience. Also, there are the proponents of various identity theories, who admit that there is such a realm, but claim that it may be in some sense identified with parts of the physical world.There are, however, other writers who accept the physicalist principle, but who nevertheless also accept that there exists a genuinely autonomous realm of conscious experience. Such writers often hold some form of panpsychism or epiphenomenalism, and in what follows these two views are briefly explained and critically discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epiphenomenalism and content.Mark Eli Kalderon - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 52 (1):71-90.
Naturalism, physicalism and epiphenomenalism.Jason Megill - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):681 – 686.
Panpsychism in the West.David Skrbina - 2005 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Being realistic - why physicalism may entail panexperientialism.Sam Coleman - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (10-11):40-52.
Hard questions - comments on Galen Strawson.Colin McGinn - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (10-11):90-99.
In defence of qualia-epiphenomenalism.Volker Gadenne - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (1-2):101-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#261,076)

6 months
10 (#274,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Objective knowledge.Karl Raimund Popper - 1972 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.
Philosophical Comments on Tarski'€™s Theory of Truth.K. Popper - 1972 - In Karl Raimund Popper (ed.), Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Biophilosophy.Bernhard Rensch - 1971 - New York,: Columbia University Press.

Add more references