Discussions: Testability and ‘ ad-hocness ’ of the contraction hypothesis

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):50-a-50 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
125 (#146,490)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the empirical equivalence between special relativity and Lorentz׳s ether theory.Pablo Acuña - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (2):283-302.
Predictivism and avoidance of ad hoc-ness: An empirical study.Samuel Schindler - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 104 (C):68-77.
Technological Origins of the Einsteinian Revolution.Donald Gillies - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (2):97-126.
De Broglie-Bohm Theory, Quo Vadis?Vera Matarese - 2022 - Foundations of Physics 53 (1):1-20.
Über die „Realität“ der FitzGerald-Lorentz-Kontraktion.Dieter Lorenz - 1982 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (2):294-319.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references