- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Index
In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 257–270 (2008)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Theism Alternatives to Theism Naturalism and Its Woes Conclusion.Author Profiles
theistic belief ‐ belief in God and epistemology of theistic belief against naturalism theists argueing about whether god knows the future Why do people believe theism? “Sensus Divinitatis”—a sense of divinity, a faculty, a set of cognitive processes to know about God alternatives to theism theistic belief and knowledge naturalism and its woes and naturalism vs. proper function naturalism, skepticism, self‐defeat dualistic naturalism
My notes
Similar books and articles
Against Naturalism.Alvin Plantinga - 2008 - In Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley (eds.), Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 1–69.
Reply to Plantinga's Opening Statement.Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley - 2008 - In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 184–217.
Closing statement and reponse to Plantinga's comments.Michael Tooley - 2008 - In Alvin Plantinga (ed.), Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 233–248.
Knowledge of God * by Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley. [REVIEW]Alvin Plantingaand & Michael Tooley - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):591-592.
Knowledge of God * by Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley.T. J. Mawson - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):591-592.
God or Blind Nature? Philosophers Debate the Evidence.Paul Draper - 2008 - Internet Infidels (Online Publisher).
Biblical and theistic arguments against the evolutionary argument against naturalism.Petteri Nieminen, Maarten Boudry, Esko Ryökäs & Anne-Mari Mustonen - 2017 - Zygon 52 (1):9-23.
Explanation and the Problem of Evil.Paul Draper & Trent Dougherty - 2013 - In Justin P. McBrayer & Daniel Howard‐Snyder (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil. Oxford, UK: Wiley. pp. 67–82.
When Naturalism and Creationism Clash: Can a Person Believe in Both God and Evolution?Osman Murat Deniz - 2015 - Dialogo 2 (1):175-178.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
4 (#1,642,306)
6 months
1 (#1,515,053)
2023-06-15
Downloads
4 (#1,642,306)
6 months
1 (#1,515,053)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes.Paul Churchland - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Incorporeality.Charles Taliaferro - 2010 - In Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 292–299.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-x7cz5 uwo