Stimulating debate: ethics in a multidisciplinary functional neurosurgery committee

Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (2):106-109 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Multidisciplinary healthcare committees meet regularly to discuss patients’ candidacy for emerging functional neurosurgical procedures, such as Deep Brain Stimulation . Through debate and discussion around the surgical candidacy of particular patients, functional neurosurgery programs begin to mold practice and policy supported both by scientific evidence and clear value choices. These neurosurgical decisions have special considerations not found in non-neurologic committees. The professional time used to resolve these conflicts provides opportunities for the emergence of careful, ethical practices simultaneous with the expansion of therapy applications

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Role of Ethics Committees in Public Debate.Lonneke M. Poort - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):19-35.
Ethics by committee: The moral authority of consensus.Jonathan D. Moreno - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.
Review of Richard Joyce, The Myth of Morality[REVIEW]R. Jay Wallace - 2003 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (11).
MUSings on Functional Disorders.Stephen Tyreman - 2010 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (4):301-303.
The controversy over retrospective moral judgment.Allen E. Buchanan - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):245-250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
22 (#708,419)

6 months
2 (#1,196,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?