Failing Is Derailing: The Underperformance as a Stressor Model

Frontiers in Psychology 11:556572 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Job performance and job stress are widely studied phenomena in occupational research. However, most of the literature on the relationship between work stress and job performance conceptualizes job stress as an antecedent of performance, in line with the stress-performance framework, and does not examine what happens to the well-being of the employees after the performance was appraised as poor. In the current theoretical paper, I argue that task underperformance is a source of stress (i.e., stressor) for the employee, and as such can affect a wide range of employee outcomes. Task underperformance is conceptualized as comprised of two main types: acute/episodic underperformance such as a mistake or an accident (e.g., medical error, service failure), and chronic task underperformance such as not achieving the expected work products over time, with an interplay between these types. The source of the appraisal (objective, supervisor-rated, and self-rated underperformance) is also considered. Several disjoint literatures are then integrated in order to explain how underperformance is expected to result in subsequent decrements to employee well-being. At the chronic underperformance level, the following literatures are included: self-efficacy, negative effects of performance feedback, stress experienced when the basic need for competency is frustrated or when underperformance presents a threat to the self-image. At the acute/episodic level, affective and cognitive outcomes are explored and examples are drawn from several industries including service failures and medical errors. The interplay between the two types of underperformance, acute/episodic and chronic, is discussed, and then relevant moderators are offered. One notable moderator is the occupation-level consequences of error which likely affects most if not all outcomes. Finally, the discussion includes potential theoretical and practical implications for this conceptualization, as well as some methodological considerations for future research in this area.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Actions and ways of failing.Joseph Margolis - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):89 – 101.
Ricceur's conception of human failing.M. Kuric - 2005 - Filozofia 60 (6):430-439.
Refraining, Omitting, and Negative Acts.Kent Bach - 2010 - In Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 50–57.
Making meaning.Gabriel Waters & Sherman Wilcox - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):644-645.
Trial and Error – Failing and Learning in Criminal Proceedings.Kati Hannken-Illjes, Livia Holden, Alexander Kozin & Thomas Scheffer - 2006 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 20 (2):159-190.
Religion’s ‘Foundation in Reason’.M. Jamie Ferreira - 1994 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (4):565-581.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-17

Downloads
9 (#1,260,789)

6 months
6 (#531,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations