Confiscation of the Proceeds of Unlawful Behaviour: Purposes and Reality (article in Lithuanian)

Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (2):675-688 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author tries to explore several new amendments to the penal code of Lithuania, made by the Law on 2 December 2010. The first amendment concerns article 72 of the Penal code of Lithuania (confiscation of property). Prior to the year 2003, confiscation of property implied the right of the court to confiscate any property in possession of the sentenced person. However the Penal code of 2003 set up a new concept of confiscation: just proceeds of the crime or objects intended to be used in committing a crime should be confiscated. However practice was very poor. New law aimed at boosting practice of confiscation, particularly from third persons, to whom usually the offender transfers property. Previous wording of the law provided for that the property should be confiscated from the third person just in case the person knew or could know that the property that he possesses is from a crime. The law of 2010 added new alternative conditions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Social Purpose of Private Property.Solveiga Cirtautienė & Dalia Vasarienė - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 118 (4):105-122.
Some Problematic Issues of Criminal Liability for Misappropriation.Romualdas Drakšas - 2013 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 20 (1):283-299.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
13 (#1,064,789)

6 months
3 (#1,046,148)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references