Pragmatic control of specificity and scope: Evidence from Dutch L1A

In Emar Maier, Corien Bary & Janneke Huitink (eds.), Proceedings of Sub9. pp. 271--285 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Pragmatic Stance.John Cantwell - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):319-336.
Scope control and grammatical dependencies.Alastair Butler - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (3):241-264.
Specificity and the interpretation of quantifiers.Georgette Ioup - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (2):233 - 245.
Depragmatized dutch book arguments.Patrick Maher - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (2):291-305.
The scope of even and quantifier raising.Kimiko Nakanishi - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (2):115-136.
Wide-Scope Requirements and the Ethics of Belief.Berit Brogaard - 2014 - In Jonathan Matheson & Rico Vitz (eds.), The Ethics of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 130–145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
3 (#1,724,854)

6 months
2 (#1,250,447)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9.Emar Maier, Corien Bary & Janneke Huitink (eds.) - 2005 - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Any.Nirit Kadmon & Fred Landman - 1993 - Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (4):353 - 422.
Pragmatics.S. C. Levinson - 1983 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 49 (3):531-532.
The Morphology of Dutch.Geert Booij - 2002 - Oxford University Press UK.

Add more references