After the subject: A response to MacKenzie

&
Educational Philosophy and Theory 27 (1):41–54 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1469-5812.1995.tb00211.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Making sense of response-dependence.Eline Busck Gundersen - unknown
Response to MacKenzie.Harvey Siegel - 1990 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 22 (1):45–47.
The distinction of substance and accident and the analogy of being.Gyula Klima - manuscript
Mr. MacKenzie's reply.J. S. Mackenzie - 1895 - International Journal of Ethics 5 (3):377-383.
The philosophy of the subject: Back to the future.Jim Mackenzie - 1998 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 30 (2):135–162.
Beyond the philosophy of the subject: Liberalism, education and the critique of individualism.Michael Peters & James Marshall - 1993 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 25 (1):19–39.
Peters and Marshall on the philosophy of the subject.Jim Mackenzie - 1995 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 27 (1):25–40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
24 (#658,913)

6 months
9 (#312,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Peters
Beijing Normal University

Citations of this work

After postmodernism in Educational (Philosophy and) Theory.Bruce Haynes - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1491-1492.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.Richard Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
Frege.Michael Dummett - 1981 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nietzsche and Philosophy.Gilles Deleuze & Michael Hardt (eds.) - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references