Abortion Law Should Align With Evidence From Neuroscience

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (12):49-51 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abortion, society, and the law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]: Press of Case Western Reserve University. Edited by J. Douglas Butler.
The other abortion myth—the failure of the common law.Kate Gleeson - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):69-81.
Law and Neuroscience: Current Legal Issues.Michael Freeman (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Minds, Brains, and Norms.Dennis Patterson - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):179-190.
Abortion and referrals for abortion: is the law in need of change?Demian Whiting - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):1006-1008.
Foundations of evidence law.Alex Stein - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
No Nonsense Neuro-law.Sarah K. Robins & Carl F. Craver - 2010 - Neuroethics 4 (3):195-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-15

Downloads
47 (#340,351)

6 months
8 (#370,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Defending My “Rethinking” of Roe.Bertha Alvarez Manninen - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (12):W3-W5.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Abortion and Moral Theory.L. W. Sumner - 1983 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):670-671.
Abortion and Moral Theory.Stanley S. Kleinberg - 1983 - Philosophical Quarterly 33 (132):310.

View all 7 references / Add more references