Response to Chappell

Religious Studies 33 (1):115-119 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I would like to begin by expressing my gratitude to Dr Chappell for the encomia he has so kindly included in his notice of my book. It was especially kind of him to include them when we appear to disagree so fundamentally on the two issues he has chosen to discuss. First, he does not think, as I do, that the world is religiously ambiguous. Second, he thinks that religious beliefs can be, and are, chosen, and I do not

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,705

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dominion.T. D. J. Chappell - 2003 - Ratio 16 (3):307–317.
Reading Plato’s Theaetetus.Timothy D. J. Chappell - 2004 - Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Pub. Co.. Edited by Plato.
Moral perception.Timothy Chappell - 2008 - Philosophy 83 (4):421-437.
Hume.Vere Claiborne Chappell - 1966 - Melbourne,: Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#698,802)

6 months
8 (#406,766)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Penelhum
Last affiliation: University of Calgary

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references