- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On 'the denial of bivalence is absurd'
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):369 – 382 (2003)
Abstract
Timothy Williamson, in various places, has put forward an argument that is supposed to show that denying bivalence is absurd. This paper is an examination of the logical force of this argument, which is found wanting.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
On 'the Denial of Bivalence is Absurd'.Robert Stainton - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):369-382.
Can one get bivalence from (tarskian) truth and falsity?Dan López de Sa - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):pp. 273-282.
Discussions: Vagueness and Bivalence: A Discussion of Williamson and Simons.B. J. Copeland - 1995 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 (1):193-200.
Does the classical principle of bivalence hold? (Charles Travis versus Timothy Williamson.).François-Igor Pris - 2014 - Litera (Russian E-Journal) (3):60-128.
An epistemic argument for tolerance.René van Woudenberg - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76 (5):428-435.
Truth and Bivalence in Aristotle. An Investigation into the Structure of Saying.Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe & María Cerezo - 2014 - In N. Öffenberger & A. Vigo (eds.), Zur modernen Deutung der Aristotelischen Logik. G. Olms.
Is Timothy Williamson a Necessary Existent.David Efird - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: metaphysics, logic, and epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Temporal Truth and Bivalence: an Anachronistic Formal Approach to Aristotle’s De Interpretatione 9.Luiz Henrique Lopes dos Santos - 2023 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 17 (1):59-79.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
87 (#199,344)
6 months
10 (#309,337)
2009-01-28
Downloads
87 (#199,344)
6 months
10 (#309,337)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Psychology of Vagueness: Borderline Cases and Contradictions.Sam Alxatib & Francis Jeffry Pelletier - 2011 - Mind and Language 26 (3):287-326.
Sorites Paradox.Dominic Hyde & Diana Raffman - 2012 - In Ed Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
References found in this work
Vagueness and ignorance.Timothy Williamson - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 145 - 177.
The sorites paradox.James Cargile - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):193-202.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-w2v2s uwo