The art of thinking: Method and subjectivity in the Port-Royal Logic

Filosofia Unisinos 18 (3):155-166 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Logic or the Art of Thinking, also called Port-Royal Logic, is an exemplar of modern reformers in logic and epistemology. Its reformism has a marked influence of Descartes, who introduces the epistemic and logical subject into the ground of justification of knowledge and judgment. A look at the method’s commitments in this text may shed light on the dynamics of the interweaving between epistemology and logic. It is in this perspective that an analysis of the use of the Aristotelian notion of “techné”, as an “art of doing anything well” seems to require attention, since it happens in a logical domain, as the authors make it. In this paper I want to make clear that the mental actions are crucial to a logic as reflexive practice. And, because of that, the very expression of “art of thinking” shows itself as non-trivial, that is, as a requirement of method.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Port Royal Logic.John N. Martin - 2017 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Judgment, Extension, Logical Form.Luciano Codato - 2008 - In Kant-Gesellschaft E. V. Walter de Gruyter (ed.), Law and Peace in Kant’s Philosophy / Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 1--139.
The art of thinking.Antoine Arnauld & Pierre Nicole - 1964 - Indianapolis,: Bobbs-Merrill. Edited by Pierre Nicole.
Logic, or, The art of thinking: containing, besides common rules, several new observations appropriate for forming judgment.Antoine Arnauld - 1996 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Pierre Nicole & Jill Vance Buroker.
Truth and Meaning in the Port-Royal Logic.Pierre Baumann - 2014 - Fenomenologia. Diálogos Possíveis Campinas: Alínea/Goiânia: Editora da Puc Goiás 96:127-140.
A Note on ‘Distributive Terms, Truth, and The Port Royal Logic’.John Neil Martin - 2016 - History and Philosophy of Logic 37 (4):391-392.
Cartesianism and Port-Royal.Steven Nadler - 1988 - The Monist 71 (4):573-584.
What logic should we think with?R. M. Sainsbury - 2002 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 51:1-17.
The Modal Equivalence Rules of the Port-Royal Logic.John Grey - 2017 - History and Philosophy of Logic 38 (3):210-221.
Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole: Logic or the Art of Thinking.Jill Vance Buroker (ed.) - 1996 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Objectivity in Logic and Nature.Richard Dien Winfield - 2002 - The Owl of Minerva 34 (1):77-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-12

Downloads
9 (#1,249,590)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katarina Peixoto
University of São Paulo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Senses and the Fleshless Eye: The Meditations as Cognitive Exercises.Gary Hatfield - 1986 - In Amelie Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes' Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 45–76.
Direct realism, intentionality, and the objective being of ideas.Paul Hoffman - 2002 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2):163-179.
Judgment and Proposition: From Descartes to Kant.Gabriël Nuchelmans - 1983 - Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid.J. W. Yolton - 1984 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 175 (3):325-326.
Method and the Study of Nature.Peter Dear - 1998 - In Daniel Garber & Michael Ayers (eds.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1.

View all 7 references / Add more references