Hume's Principle and entitlement: on the epistemology of the neo-Fregean programme

In Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (eds.), Abstractionism: Essays in Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reals by Abstraction.Bob Hale - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):100--123.
Which abstraction principles are acceptable? Some limitative results.Øystein Linnebo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):239-252.
Is Hume's principle analytic?Crispin Wright - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):307-333.
Frege meets dedekind: A neologicist treatment of real analysis.Stewart Shapiro - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):335--364.
On finite hume.Fraser Macbride - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):150-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-17

Downloads
17 (#860,469)

6 months
1 (#1,479,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Limits of Reconstructive Neologicist Epistemology.Eileen S. Nutting - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (273):717-738.
Books of Essays.Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock - 2017 - Philosophia Mathematica:nkw34.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references