The politics of modern honor

Contemporary Political Theory 17 (4):459-477 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern honor appears to be distinguished by two contradictory impulses, a neglect or even disdain of honor, and an ambition to elevate and promote it as dignity, self-esteem, and recognition. The article argues that these tensions can be traced to a foundational difference regarding the political importance of the passion of honor, evident in the seminal and contending formulations by Machiavelli and Hobbes. In recovering and articulating the bases of these competing modern conceptions of honor and tracing the influence of their divergent trajectories, the article seeks to show the importance of honor for understanding contemporary politics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Honor: a phenomenology.Robert L. Oprisko - 2012 - New York: Routledge.
Honor and the Military.Peter Olsthoorn - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1):159-172.
Honor, Self and Social Reproduction.Vern Baxter & A. V. Margavio - 2011 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (2):121-142.
Understanding Honor.Whitley Kaufman - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (4):557-573.
Understanding Honor.Whitley Kaufman - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (4):557-573.
Honor and public opinion.José Carlos Amdela - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (4).
Honor and Public Opinion.José Carlos Del Ama - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (4):441-460.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-06

Downloads
31 (#528,134)

6 months
9 (#349,017)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?