The Legal Research Committee: A Response to Roy-Toole

Research Ethics 5 (1):30-32 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The role of the REC is to aim for a fair and effective trial protocol and to provide to potential trial subjects sufficient information to allow them to make a rational decision on whether to participate in it or not. The members are medical specialists and members of the public together fitted to these tasks. In his paper ‘Illegality in the research protocol: the duty of research ethics committees under the 2001 Clinical Trials Directive’ Roy-Toole has made a number of suggestions on how to improve the function of the RECs, but he has not given persuasive evidence to show that the RECs themselves are the most effective bodies to implement possible legal requirements to improve medical research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal Originality.Mathias M. Siems - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1):147-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
20 (#770,420)

6 months
3 (#982,484)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?