Preposcription semantics and KDDc

Abstract

This logic has a standard one-dimensional possible worlds semantics with an accessibility relation (I will call this, for short, the accessibility semantics for KDDc4, contrasting with the preposcription semantics given in “Command and consequence”). In the accessibility semantics, the semantic value of a sentence is a world (rather than a pair of worlds)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

“Four-Valued” Semantics for the Relevant Logic R.Edwin D. Mares - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341.
A star-free semantics for R.Edwin D. Mares - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (2):579 - 590.
Two-dimensional semantics.Laura Schroeter - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Weak liberated versions of T and S.Charles G. Morgan - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (1):25-30.
The handbook of contemporary semantic theory.Shalom Lappin (ed.) - 1996 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Reference.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-06

Downloads
170 (#113,544)

6 months
54 (#84,854)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Josh Parsons
PhD: Australian National University; Last affiliation: University of Otago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references