Benchmarking Tendencies in Managerial Mindsets: Prioritizing Stockholders and Stakeholders in Peru, South Africa, and the United States

Journal of Business Ethics 118 (3):589-605 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Managers in Peru, South Africa, and the United States were classified into four groups along Singhapakdi et al. (J Bus Ethics 15:1131–1140, 1996) Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility (PRESOR) scale. In Peru and the United States, individuals in the ethics and social responsibility first category reported greater satisfaction with organizational performance than did those in the profits first category. Moral capitalists—individuals who report high emphases on both social responsibility and profits—reported the highest satisfaction with performance in the United States. Managers in the United States are more likely than their counterparts in Peru and South Africa to reject the mutual exclusivity of prioritizing social responsibility and profits simultaneously. Directions for future research are outlined

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theorising South Africa’s Corporate Governance.Andrew West - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 68 (4):433 - 448.
Corporate governance in south Africa.G. J. Rossouw, A. van der Watt & D. P. Malan Rossouw - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):289 - 302.
Getting Real.Andrew Wicks - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (2):273-293.
The Morality of the Corporation.Ian Maitland - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):445-458.
The moral responsibilities of stockholders.Richard J. Klonoski - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):385 - 390.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-08

Downloads
36 (#452,742)

6 months
6 (#566,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?