A General Model for the Adaptive Function of Self-Knowledge in Animals and Humans

Consciousness and Cognition 6 (1):75-86 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article offers a general definition of self-knowledge that embraces all forms and levels of self-knowledge in animals and humans. It is hypothesized that various levels of self-knowledge constitute an ordinal scale such that each species in a lineage displays the forms of self-knowledge found in related species as well as new forms it and its sister species may have evolved. Likewise, it is hypothesized that these various forms of levels of self-knowledge develop in the sequence in which they evolved. Finally, a general hypothesis for the functional significance of self-knowledge is proposed along with subhypotheses regarding the adaptive significance of various levels of self-knowledge in mammals including human and nonhuman primates. The general hypothesis is that self-knowledge serves as a standard for assessing the qualities of conspecifics compared to those of the self. Such assessment is crucial to deciding among alternative reproductive and subsistence strategies. The qualities that are assessed, which vary across taxa, range from the size and strength of the self to its mathematical or musical abilities. This so-called assessment model of self-knowledge is based on evolutionary biological models for social selection and the role of assessment in animal communication

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal ethics and interest conflicts.Elisa Aaltola - 2005 - Ethics and the Environment 10 (1):19-48.
Moral community and animal research in medicine.R. G. Frey - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):123 – 136.
Animal Rights and the Problem of Proximity.David E. W. Fenner - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):51-61.
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Animals, handicapped children and the tragedy of marginal cases.J. L. Nelson - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (4):191-193.
Are humans superior to animals and plants?Paul W. Taylor - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (2):149-160.
Adaptive altruistic strategies.Dennis L. Krebs - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):265-266.
Comparing Lives: Rush Rhees on Humans and Animals.Matthew Pianalto - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):287-311.
The rights of humans and other animals.Tom Regan - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):103 – 111.
Live Free or Die. [REVIEW]Joel Marks - 2010 - Animal Law 17 (1):243-250.
Derrida’s Flair.Michael Naas - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):219-242.
Is echo a complex adaptive system?Mark Bedau - 2000 - Evolutionary Computation 8 (4):419-442.
We should not allow dissection of animals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):181-189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-01

Downloads
49 (#326,442)

6 months
3 (#984,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?