Teleosemantics and indeterminacy

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (1):1-14 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to defend the teleological theory of representation against an objection by Jerry Fodor. I shall argue that previous attempts to answer this objection fail to recognize the importance of belief-desire structure for the teleological theory of representation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deep metaphysical indeterminacy.Bradford Skow - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):851 - 858.
Indeterminacy and interpretation.Günter Abel - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):403 – 419.
A proper understanding of Millikan.Justine Kingsbury - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (40):23-40.
Narrow content and historical accounts: Can Fodor live without them?Kam-Yuen Cheng - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:101-113.
Intentionality, representation, and function.David Pickles - 1989 - Sussex University, Cognitive Science Research Paper 140.
Teleosemantics and the troubles of naturalism.Steven J. Wagner - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (1):81-110.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
262 (#78,683)

6 months
19 (#140,013)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Papineau
King's College London

Citations of this work

Teleological theories of mental content.Peter Schulte & Karen Neander - 2022 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Agential Teleosemantics.Tiago Rama - 2022 - Dissertation, Autonomous University of Barcelona
Pains as reasons.Manolo Martínez - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2261-2274.
Teleosemantics and Indeterminacy.Manolo Martínez - 2013 - Dialectica 67 (4):427-453.

View all 45 citations / Add more citations