Automatic argumentative analysis for interaction mining

&
Argument and Computation 2 (2-3):77 - 106 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Interaction mining is about discovering and extracting insightful information from digital conversations, namely those human?human information exchanges mediated by digital network technology. We present in this article a computational model of natural arguments and its implementation for the automatic argumentative analysis of digital conversations, which allows us to produce relevant information to build interaction business analytics applications overcoming the limitations of standard text mining and information retrieval technology. Applications include advanced visualisations and abstractive summaries

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/19462166.2011.608225

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Informational privacy, data mining, and the internet.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):137-145.
Data mining: Proprietary rights, people and proposals.Dinah Payne & Cherie Courseault Trumbach - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (3):241-252.
Statistical themes and lessons for data mining.Clark Glymour - manuscript
KDD, data mining, and the challenge for normative privacy.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):265-273.
From Connectives to Argumentative Markers: A Quest for Markers of Argumentative Moves and of Related Aspects of Argumentative Discourse. [REVIEW]Assimakis Tseronis - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):427-447.
The Importance of Actualizing Control in the Processing of Instructional Information.Marty J. Wolf - 2013 - Philosophy and Technology 26 (1):67-70.
Mining R. Shepherd: Ancient Mining. Pp. xv+494; 69 figs. London and New York: Institution of Mining and Metallurgy by Elsevier Applied Science, 1993. Cased. [REVIEW]David W. J. Gill - 1995 - The Classical Review 45 (01):143-145.
Ethical issues in interaction design.Toni Robertson - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (2):49-59.
Mining, displacement and the world bank: A case analysis of compania minera antamina's operations in peru. [REVIEW]David Szablowski - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 39 (3):247 - 273.
All that glitters is not gold: Digging beneath the surface of data mining. [REVIEW]Anthony Danna & Oscar H. Gandy - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 40 (4):373 - 386.
Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations.Sarah Bigi - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):51-65.
Distributed Cognition, Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research.David Kirsh, Jim Hollan & Edwin Hutchins - 2000 - ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7 (2):174-196.
Data mining to combat terrorism and the roots of privacy concerns.Frans A. J. Birrer - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):211-220.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-07

Downloads
60 (#274,310)

6 months
11 (#271,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Forms of Talk.Erving Goffman - 1981 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 17 (3):181-182.
Interrogatives: Questions, facts and dialogue.Jonathan Ginzburg - 1996 - In Shalom Lappin (ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell Reference.

Add more references