An epistemic logic of preferences

Synthese 201 (3):1-36 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article studies preferences of agents in a setting with imperfect information. For such a setting, the authors propose a new class of preferences. It is said that an agent prefers one statement over another if, among all indistinguishable worlds, the agent prefers the worlds where the first statement is true to those where the second one is true. The main technical result is a sound and complete logical system describing the interplay between a binary modality capturing preferences and the knowledge modality. The proof of completeness is using a newly proposed “tumbled pairs” technique.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mistakes about Preferences in the Social Sciences.M. Hausman Daniel - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):3-25.
Mistakes about Preferences in the Social Sciences.Daniel M. Hausman - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):3-25.
Dynamic Epistemic Logic.Hans van Ditmarsch, Wiebe van der Hoek & Barteld Kooi - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dynamic Epistemic Logic.Hans van Ditmarsch, and, Wiebe van der Hoek & Barteld Kooi - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A History Based Logic for Dynamic Preference Updates.Can Başkent & Guy McCusker - 2020 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 29 (3):275-305.
Other-Regarding Preferences.Elias L. Khalil & Alain Marciano - 2021 - Social Theory and Practice 47 (2):265-298.
Preferences’ Significance Does Not Depend on Their Content.Evan G. Williams - 2014 - New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (2):211-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-17

Downloads
25 (#632,603)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pavel Naumov
University of Southampton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations