Leibniz’s Imaginary Bridge. The Analogy between Pure Possibles and Imaginary Numbers in the Paris Writings

Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 10:133-167 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter discusses the analogy between bare possibles and imaginary numbers, developed by Leibniz during his Paris years. In this period, he came to realize that imaginary quantities are not impossible in themselves, but they cannot be geometrically represented, for they cannot be ordered within the number line. Similarly, he regarded actual things as belonging to a single ‘series of things’, where each member is connected to every other by relations of position and succession. Bare possibles, on the contrary, can be placed nowhere in the series and, therefore, must be regarded as fictions (though reference to them is in a sense unavoidable, like the use of imaginary quantities in algebra). The young Leibniz does not extend the model of a ‘series of things’ to possibles, thus in this period he seems to reject the very idea of a plurality of possible worlds.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Role of Models in Boltzmann’s.Nadine De Courtenay - 2002 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:103-119.
Musil’s Imaginary Bridge.Achille C. Varzi - 2014 - The Monist 97 (1):30-46.
Leibniz’s Relational Conception of Number.Kyle Sereda - 2015 - The Leibniz Review 25:31-54.
The analytic imaginary.Marguerite La Caze - 2002 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Imaginary bodies and worlds.Kathleen Lennon - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):107 – 122.
Emerging from imaginary time.Robert J. Deltete & Reed A. Guy - 1996 - Synthese 108 (2):185 - 203.
Leibniz on Shape and the Reality of Body.Timothy Dale Crockett - 2004 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Who is afraid of imaginary objects?Gabriele Contessa - 2009 - In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "On Denoting". Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-16

Downloads
30 (#544,059)

6 months
10 (#299,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Osvaldo Ottaviani
Radboud University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references