Does mathematics have objects? In what sense?

Synthese 134 (1-2):181 - 216 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2004

DOI

10.1023/a:1022191731931

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The indispensability argument and multiple foundations for mathematics.Alan Baker - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):49–67.
Mathematics and poetry.Ermanno Bencivenga - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):158 – 169.
There are vague objects (in any sense in which there are ordinary objects).Jiri Benovsky - 2008 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (3):1-4.
Mathematics. A science of patterns?Gianluigi Oliveri - 1997 - Synthese 112 (3):379-402.
A subject with no object: strategies for nominalistic interpretation of mathematics.John P. Burgess & Gideon Rosen - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Gideon A. Rosen.
Structuralism and metaphysics.Charles Parsons - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):56--77.
Aristotle on Mathematical Truth.Phil Corkum - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (6):1057-1076.
How are Mathematical Objects Constituted? A Structuralist Answer.Wolfgang Spohn - unknown
Mathematics, science and ontology.Thomas Tymoczko - 1991 - Synthese 88 (2):201 - 228.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
64 (#255,103)

6 months
6 (#531,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Kant’s analytic-geometric revolution.Scott Heftler - 2011 - Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references