- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Rethinking the Scientific Revolution
Margaret J. Osler (ed.)
Cambridge University Press (2000)
Abstract
This collection reconsiders canonical figures and the formation of disciplinary boundaries during the Scientific Revolution.
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Chapters
Catholic natural philosophy: Alchemy and the revivification of Sir Kenelm Digby. (pages 89--110)Bruce Janacek
Arguing about Nothing: Henry More and Robert Boyle on the Theological Implications of the Void. (pages 153--179)Jane E. Jenkins
The alchemies of Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton: Alternate approaches and divergent deployments. (pages 201--220)Lawrence M. Principe
Similar books and articles
Scientific culture and the making of the industrial West.Margaret C. Jacob - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Margaret C. Jacob.
Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
The fate of the date: The theology of Newton's principia revised.J. E. McGuire - 2000 - In Margaret J. Osler (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge University Press. pp. 271--96.
Was the scientific revolution really a revolution in science?Gary Hatfield - 1996 - In Jamil Ragep & Sally Ragep (eds.), Tradition, Transmission, Transformation: Proceedings of Two Conferences on Pre-Modern Science Held at the University of Oklahoma. Brill. pp. 489–525.
Scientific understanding after the Ingold revolution in organic chemistry.William Goodwin - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (3):386-408.
Rethinking sovereignty, rethinking revolution.Matthew Noah Smith - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (4):405-440.
Osler, Margaret J., ed. Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. [REVIEW]Richard J. Blackwell - 2001 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (3):668-669.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-06-22
Downloads
62 (#262,361)
6 months
4 (#799,256)
2010-06-22
Downloads
62 (#262,361)
6 months
4 (#799,256)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why was there no controversy over Life in the Scientific Revolution?Charles T. Wolfe - 2010 - In Victor Boantza Marcelo Dascal (ed.), Controversies in the Scientific Revolution. John Benjamins.
Naturalizing Badiou: mathematical ontology and structural realism.Fabio Gironi - 2014 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
The reception of Newton's gravitational theory by huygens, varignon, and maupertuis: How normal science may be revolutionary.Koffi Maglo - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (2):135-169.
Modelos interpretativos del corpus newtoniano: Tradiciones historiográficas del siglo XX.Sergio H. Orozco-Echeverri - 2007 - Estudios de Filosofía (Universidad de Antioquia) 35:227-256.
Inventing scientific method: The privilege system as a model for scientific knowledge-production.Marius Buning - 2014 - Intellectual History Review 24 (1):59-70.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c88c7cdf7-xpqc6 uwo