Parsimonious feedback

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):51-52 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The insistence on strict seriality and the proscription of feedback in phonological encoding place counterproductive limitations on the theory and WEAVER ++ model. Parsimony cannot be stipulated as a property of the language system itself. Lifting the methodological prohibition on feedback would allow free exploration of its functionality in relation to the substantial content of this major research program

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feedback about feedback: Reply to Ehring.Frederick Adams - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):123-131.
Will one stage and no feedback suffice in lexicalization?Trevor A. Harley - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):45-45.
Purpose, feedback, and evolution.Arthur E. Falk - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (2):198-217.
Features and feedback.Tobey L. Doeleman, Joan A. Sereno, Allard Jongman & Sara C. Sereno - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):328-329.
Phonemic organization does not occur: Hence no feedback.Richard M. Warren - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):350-351.
A cybernetic theory of morality and moral autonomy.Jean Chambers - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):177-192.
Feedback consistency effects.Johannes C. Ziegler & Guy C. Van Orden - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):351-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
19 (#802,800)

6 months
1 (#1,477,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references