Modernity is a qualitative, not a chronological, category

Abstract

Few thickets are more tangled than that in which the idea of modernity has become enmeshed, few topics less likely to inspire confidence than the question of its relations to the ‘postmodern’. Not least of the problems concerns the character and status of the concept of modernity itself. For it is far from clear that the main figures in recent debates have been writing about, and disputing, the same set of issues when the term has been used. This is of course, in one sense, precisely the point: it is the meaning of ‘modernity’ that is in dispute, and the argument is hardly just terminological. Nonetheless, there remains considerable scope for reflection about what kind of concept ‘modernity’ is, and in particular for a more systematic consideration of the relations between its various uses. What follows is offered as a preliminary contribution to this task.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Unending modernity.David S. Stern - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):277 – 288.
The impertinent self: a heroic history of modernity.Josef Früchtl - 2009 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Modernity, Science, and Democracy.Sandra Harding - 2006 - Social Philosophy Today 22:17-42.
The impertinent self: a heroic history of modernity.Josef Früchtl - 2009 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Modernity, disenchantment, and the ironic imagination.Michael T. Saler - 2004 - Philosophy and Literature 28 (1):137-149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-24

Downloads
52 (#307,868)

6 months
13 (#199,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?