Recognition of bilaterally presented words varying in concreteness and frequency: Lateral dominance or sequential processing?

&
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (2):179-180 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03337159

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A reply to McKeever’s “On Orenstein’s and Meighan’s finding of left visual field recognition superiority for bilaterally presented words”.Howard B. Orenstein - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (2):87-87.
On Orenstein’s and Meighan’s finding of left visual field recognition superiority for bilaterally presented words.Walter F. Mckeever - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (2):85-86.
Word length and exposure time effects on the recognition of bilaterally presented words.Kathleen M. Gill & Walter F. McKeever - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (3):173-175.
Effects of priority instructions on processing hypercapacity sequential inputs of pictures and words.Lorraine F. Kubicek & Matthew H. Erdelyi - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):729.
Tachistoscopic recognition thresholds, paired-associate learning, and free recall as a function of abstractness-concreteness and word frequency.Wilma A. Winnick & Kenneth Kressel - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (2):163.
The Modulation of Visual and Task Characteristics of a Writing System on Hemispheric Lateralization in Visual Word Recognition—A Computational Exploration.Janet H. Hsiao & Sze Man Lam - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (5):861-890.
Recognition of continuous speech requires top-down processing.Kenneth N. Stevens - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):348-348.
Parallel versus sequential processing of pictures and words.Joan G. Snodgrass & George Antone - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (1):139.
Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words.Richard L. Solomon & Leo Postman - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (3):195.
Why homolaterality of language and hand dominance may not be the expression of a specific evolutionary link.Bencie Woll & Jechil S. Sieratzki - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):241-241.
Retention of frequency information with observations on recognition and recall.Benton J. Underwood, Joel Zimmerman & Joel S. Freund - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (2):149.
The interaction of frequency, emotional tone, and set in visual recognition.Samuel C. Fulkerson - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (3):188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
15 (#951,094)

6 months
4 (#797,974)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references