On Functional Definitions Of Art: A Response to Rowe

British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (1):67-71 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a critical assessment of M. W. Rowe's functional definition of art.

Similar books and articles

Rowe's evidential arguments from evil.Graham Oppy - 2013 - In Justin P. Mcbrayer (ed.), A Companion to the Problem of Evil. Wiley. pp. 49-66.
On definitions of consciousness.Anders Sogaard & Stine Osterskov Sogaard - 2009 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (5):46-53.
What no eye has seen: the skeptical theist response to Rowe's evidential argument from evil.Nick Trakakis - 2012 - Philo: The Journal of the Society of Humanist Philosophers 6 (2):250-266.
Can God be free?: Rowe's dilemma for theology.William Hasker - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (4):453-462.
Meno's Paradox in Context.David Ebrey - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):4-24.
Reply to Rowe.Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith - 2012 - The Journal of Ethics 16 (3):325-338.
Rowe's Probabilistic Argument from Evil.Richard Otte - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (2):147-171.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
480 (#41,505)

6 months
63 (#79,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references