On Davies' institutional definition of art

Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):371-382 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a critique of Stephen Davies' institutional definition of art. I argue that Davies' definition suffers from a range of problems.

Similar books and articles

A defence of the institutional definition of art.Stephen Davies - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):307-324.
Definitions of art.Stephen Davies - 1991 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
First Art and Art’s Definition.Stephen Davies - 1997 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):19-34.
The Intentional-Attributive Definition of Art.Alex Aliyev - 2009 - Consciousness, Literature and the Arts 10 (2).
Philosophical perspectives on art.Stephen Davies - 2007 - New York;: Oxford University Press.
Are Video Games Art?Aaron Smuts - 2005 - Contemporary Aesthetics 3.
Trying to define art as the sum of the arts.Stephen Davies - 2008 - Pazhouhesh Nameh-E Farhangestan-E Honar (Research Journal of the Iranian Academy of the Arts) 8:12–23.
Defining art, defending the canon, contesting culture.Paul Crowther - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):361-377.
The end of an institutional definition of art.Robert Stecker - 1986 - British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (2):124-132.
The Eschatological Character of Contemporary Art Theory.Sixto J. Castro - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:27-32.
Silent Music.Andrew Kania - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (4):343-353.
The Artist: Definition, Re-definition, De-definition.Grzegorz Sztabiński - 2004 - Art Inquiry. Recherches Sur les Arts 6:7-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
369 (#56,124)

6 months
82 (#60,716)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references