Two questions on the definition of man's status in nature

Journal of Philosophy 56 (5):208-214 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0022362X

DOI

10.2307/2022632

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Interpretation and the origin of life.Christopher Southgate & Andrew Robinson - 2010 - Zygon 45 (2):345-360.
Human nature: How normative might it be?Kurt Bayertz - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (2):131 – 150.
Nature and man: Dilemma of the present and the future.Jerzy Wroblewski - 1987 - Theoria 2 (2):309-322.
The nature of man in St. Thomas Aquinas compared with the nature of man in American sociology.Roberta Snell - 1942 - Washington, D.C.,: The Catholic university of American press.
The Status and Significance of Aristotle’s Definition of Nature.Jean De Groot - 1999 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 73:99-107.
Defining perception and cognition.Dennis J. McFarland & Anthony T. Cacace - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):385-385.
Aristotle's Use of Genos in Logic, Philosophy, and Science.Jeffrey Carr - 2007 - Peter Lang.
The difference of man and the difference it makes.Mortimer Jerome Adler - 1967 - New York: Fordham University Press.
The definition of lying.Thomas L. Carson - 2006 - Noûs 40 (2):284–306.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
199 (#102,439)

6 months
1 (#1,501,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references