Who is Anselm’s fool?

New Scholasticism 63 (3):313-325 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00286621

DOI

10.5840/newscholas198963316

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

St. Anselm's Proslogion: With a Reply on Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilo and the Author's Reply to Gaunilo.M. J. Charlesworth (ed.) - 1965 - University of Notre Dame Press.
St. Anselm's Proslogion with A reply on behalf of the fool.Maxwell John Charlesworth - 1979 - Notre Dame [Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press. Edited by M. J. Charlesworth, Gaunilo & Anselm.
Who is Anselm’s fool?Thomas O’Loughlin - 1989 - New Scholasticism 63 (3):313-325.
St. Anselm's Proslogion: With a Reply on Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilo and the Author's Reply to Gaunilo.Saint Anselm - 1979 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Proslogium; monologium; gaunilon's on behalf of the fool. Anselm - unknown
Anselm and the fool.R. L. Barnette - 1975 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (4):201 - 218.
Objection to a simplified ontological argument.G. Oppy - 2011 - Analysis 71 (1):105-106.
The fool and the ontological status of st Anselm's argument.Albert W. Wald - 1974 - Heythrop Journal 15 (4):406–422.
Basic writings: Proslogium; Monologium; Gaunilon's on behalf of the fool; Cur deus homo. Anselm - 1962 - La Salle, Ill.,: Open Court Pub. Co.. Edited by S. N. Deane.
St. Anselm's Proslogium, Monologium, an Appendix in Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilon, and Cur Deus Homo.Sidney Norton Deane - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (3):384-385.
St. Anselm's Proslogion, with A Reply on Behalf of the Fool and The Author's Reply to Gaunilo.J. Charlesworth - 1967 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 22 (1):82-83.
Two Psychological Defenses of Hobbes’s Claim Against the “Fool”.Gregory J. Robson - 2015 - Hobbes Studies 28 (2):132-148.
Hobbes's Fool the Stultus, Grotius, and the Epicurean Tradition.Patricia Springborg - 2010 - Hobbes Studies 23 (1):29-53.
In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Scotus's rejection of Anselm.Peter King - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
11 (#1,130,421)

6 months
8 (#351,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references