Some thoughts on "what the natural scientist needs from the social scientist"

Philosophy of Science 15 (2):85-86 (1948)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

More and more, natural scientists are becoming aware that they must consider the human element as one of the variables in physical measurement. Its measure has usually been hidden in what has been called the error of measurement. Part of its measure has been qualitative for we often hear that Mr. Soandso is a good or a poor experimenter or observer. As we go to engineering research or to any applied field, we become more conscious of the human element. Here, an attempt is made to design apparatus and measuring equipment that will operate or make measurements with minimum variability associated with people. Some problems, such as those dealing with what consumers want, require an even more complete knowledge about the behavior of people. It is not possible to define or to specify a product that will be satisfactory to the consumer if we do not know what the consumer wants. Hence, it is our first observation that the natural scientist needs information about the human element that is always present to some degree in his work.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A defence of scottish common sense.Michael Pakaluk - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):564-581.
Metaphor in social science.Eleonora Montuschi - 1996 - Theoria 11 (1):49-61.
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.
Practical Knowledge and Participant Observation.Julie Zahle - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):50 - 65.
Moral responsibility and the 'ignorant scientist'.John Forge - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):341-349.
Scientific discovery on positive data via belief revision.Eric Martin & Daniel Osherson - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (5):483-506.
A natural scientist and a social scientist explore the dilemma of science.Arnoldo K. Ventura - 2003 - Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle Publishers. Edited by Angela Ramsay.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#382,085)

6 months
21 (#129,758)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references